|
Post by Stromer on Mar 31, 2018 8:56:08 GMT -5
It's great! Many thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Tom/CalClassic on Mar 31, 2018 10:43:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jagdflieger on Mar 31, 2018 13:48:27 GMT -5
I probably fly into and out of the NW airfields more than any other airfields in my Calclassic World so this is indeed good news. I've always noticed the lack of a realistic Boeing Field when flying into and out of SEATAC. While I first flew out of Boeing Field in 1970 on an Army contract DC8, I'm now looking forward to flying out of it again circa mid 1960s while in the comfort of my home.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2018 17:30:19 GMT -5
Well it covers so much I am amazed having finally installed it my only comment and it applies to all CC stuff, amazing detail and coverage and so easy on framerates compared to commercial stuff. For example; I took the Viscount into Portland International as a try out smooth as silk, just as much detail as say an ORBX major airport for OZ (Canberra) which is half the size of Portland in real life really yet that scenery will bring my system to its knees. Unless you have a super computer 64 bit stuff is not all its cracked up to be is all I can say, everyone just stuffs twice as much stuff in than they used to, scenery or aircraft.
|
|
|
Post by cgold on Apr 6, 2018 13:31:21 GMT -5
I must have. Thank you for the heads up!
|
|
|
Post by Dennis the menace on Apr 6, 2018 20:09:57 GMT -5
Thanks for the kind words!
I do try my hardest to reduce polygons as much as I can, always dividing edges, snapping and welding vertices, creating LODs if necessary. No scenery is fun if it drags a computer down to a crawl.
Glad you liked Portland. Seattle is nice, and so is Spokane.
Every time I think about updating one my old sceneries (some of them look pretty sparse now), I end up starting something new.
I'll be releasing two new sceneries in the next couple of weeks.
Mike
|
|