Can FSUIPC affect the flight dynamics of FS9?

[blueaircraft]

I'm reading the PDF provided (for "average" FS9 users), and I'm still not sure if FSUIPC can permanently change flight dynamics of aircraft. Am I correct if I say that FSUIPC can only affect aircraft flight dynamics if you assign axis assignments and key presses and buttons/joysticks? Or can it affect the FD "by virtue of simply existing and not at all touching FSUIPC's settings? It appears to me that the PDF states that it can work with external programs. I haven't memorized a lot of these programs but I can say that I simply installed FSUIPC for weather radar compatibility (for both Calclassic and other aircraft). No external programs or modules (except gauges from here and other aircraft addons). I basically have a vanilla FS9 setup apart from add-on planes and scenery, and FSUIPC. Virtually all of my add-ons come from Calclassic and HJG (including "outside" releases such as those from Mike Stone and David Maltby respectively), so I doubt the aircraft's FD clash with each other (and a lot of you have my type of collection too!). Anyways, I am asking this because I fly around on keyboard (one day I'll buy a yoke, likely later this year) and sometimes do "acrobatics" with Calclassic aircraft - around 6000-7000 ft, and the aircraft tend to "survive" this (I have the option of stress on aircraft on), as well as me regaining control of it quite easily. I do this with both light and heavy fuel (payload stays default). Tom did say in a related thread of mine that FS9 is not known for super-realistic FD, but I just want to make sure that FSUIPC does not "by default" mess up FD. If it does, how can I rectify it? Again, I have a basically vanilla FS9 - no programs apart from FSUIPC and add-ons that are aircraft and scenery. Again, I basically have Calclassic and HJG add-ons, and from reading past threads, I know some of you fly both prop and jetliners... so I doubt aircraft clashes are the reason. I fly on keyboard so again, I cannot accurately gauge FD all that well.

Again sending my regards
Andrew

[Jorge]

Andrew,

I'm not sure if FSUIPC can do that or not, unless you actually have some sort of gauge that will do that in conjunction with FSUIPC. From what you have posted, I doubt this is the case.

As for the "stress" not breaking an airplane, all I can say is that you're doing a better job of mimicking "Tex" Johnston than me!

Remember, when you keep a coordinated control input you are able to maintain 1G of force on the aircraft. If you can keep this throughout the "aerobatics" from entry to exit, then you can "trick" the airplane into thinking it's still flying along at level flight. All it "knows" is that it's still at 1G of force on the airframe.

Tex's ability to do that in the 707 back in 1955 is what kept the thing from falling out of the sky, despite the fact he did a barrel roll, followed by a chandelle to change direction, followed by another barrel roll on the way back!

Regards,

Jorge
Miami, FL

[Tom/CalClassic]

Hi, as far as I know FS does not model aerobatic stresses (or at least not accurately). So propliners surviving that is not surprising to me. And as Jorge says if you are careful you can avoid overstressing anyway. And I don’t think FSUIPC changes any of that.

[blueaircraft]

Thanks Jorge and Tom! Seems like all is well for now... thanks again 

Regards
Andrew