Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
DC3-C
Dec 16, 2008 15:56:16 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2008 15:56:16 GMT -5
hi,
When it comes to flying realistically my favourite aircraft is charles Owen's DC3-C. No equivalent so far. Nevertheless, I have noticed a confusing feature with the attitude indicator. It works opposite other attitude indicators. On every aircraft the pointer is fixed and the angle markers rotates whereas in the DC3-C, it is the opposite. When I fly IMC it is extremely confusing because I am not used to it. Since this aircraft was betatested by some calclassic members, I would like to know if there is a fix to this problem. Thanks
|
|
|
DC3-C
Dec 16, 2008 21:46:35 GMT -5
Post by PeteHam on Dec 16, 2008 21:46:35 GMT -5
Hi Yankeegolf,
I don't have this particular DC-3 ( mine's the MAAM DC-3 ) but if you're wanting to replace the attitude indicator it's really easy to copy and paste another AI into the panel cfg.
For an example, here's the one out of Trev Morson's DC-3 panel .... you would need to have his gauges for it to work though.
gauge12=C47!attitude_indicator, 227,435,93,101
Put these .... // infront of the existing entry //gauge12=your dc-3 attitude_indicator, 227,435,93,101
The gauge number and the position and size numbers would be the same as the original.
Hope this helps.
Pete.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
DC3-C
Dec 17, 2008 16:16:34 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2008 16:16:34 GMT -5
Thank you for your reply. But it is daunting! I have found a very detailed step by step tutorial for gauge editing which explains everything, even for complete novices. Impressive piece of work. Found it on the simviation website, file name: Simple panel design, PDToot.zip. Now I have to digest it but it looks promising.
I am wondering if old attitude indicators where designed the way they are modeled on the DC3-C. It is a dramatic change from "new" ones and with no ground references, I quickly get disoriented and tend to make the wrong corrections. So I fly on autopilot and it fixes the problem.
By the way, you should try the DC3-C because it includes a comprehensive realistic system modelisation coupled with a very convincing failure simulation. You must fly by the book or you will end up in serious trouble!
|
|
|
DC3-C
Dec 17, 2008 17:34:39 GMT -5
Post by Tom/CalClassic on Dec 17, 2008 17:34:39 GMT -5
Take a look at the default DC-3 panel - I assume it has an old time gauge.
|
|
|
DC3-C
Dec 17, 2008 19:31:26 GMT -5
Post by ozbeowulf on Dec 17, 2008 19:31:26 GMT -5
I've flown behind a fair number of old artificial horizons, but I can't recall any of them where the aircraft symbol moved in relation to the instrument case. It should be fixed (except when you raise or lower it with the adjustment knob) and the background should move. To my mind, this is the only logical way for an a/h to operate because it correctly maintains the spatial reference between the pilot's body and the aircraft's wings. That way, whenever you add, say, more pitch control, the nose of the aircraft goes up as viewed by you and by the a/h. (I know that is not true in EVERY instance, but please bear with me.) Anything else would make instrument flying extremely difficult, I think. Having said that, I seem to recall reading somewhere that Russian artificial horizons act "backwards", so to speak, just as YankeeGolf described in his original post. Maybe it's all in what you get used to. I hope this hasn't confused anyone any more than I've confused myself. Cheers, Glenn Added later: Okay, I have confirmed my hazy memory re the differences between Western and Russian artificial horizons. It is a serious issue. The link below considers it a likely reason for the Flash Airlines 737 crash on departure from Sharm el-Sheikh in 2004. www.aviationtoday.com/av/categories/commercial/993.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
DC3-C
Dec 19, 2008 12:54:01 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2008 12:54:01 GMT -5
hi, I have solved the problem. My idea was to invert the rotation of the pointer. For that I modified the XML gauge file (with a programming tip that I got from a famous and helpful avsim member on the panel design forum). No more spatial disorientations!
In fact it is a well known problem: I found the following in the FAA pilot's handbook of aeronautical knowledge ( very informative and down loadable for free from the FAA website; Highly recommended)
"Most banking scale indicators on the top of the instrument move in the same direction from that in which the airplane is actually banked. Some other models move in the opposite direction from that in which the airplane is actually banked. This may confuse the pilot if the indicator is used to determine the direction of bank."
I discussed this a colleague who is a former flight instructor and , he was well aware of this problem because in his academy he had one aircraft with the old attitude indicator which caused some problems to the students...
|
|